Search thousands of podcasts, books, movies, and transcripts

Products

Media monitoringSentiment analysis

Blog

IMDb for PodcastsMedia Monitoring ToolsSentiment Analysis in PR and MarketingThe Evolution of Media MonitoringMastering Podcast AdvertisingAudio Market Research has been unlockedAI in Podcast Sentiment AnalysisPodcast intelligence
© 2024 Discotech BV
Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
    Episode 116: Pain, Pleasure, and Peer-Reviewed Penises

    Episode 116: Pain, Pleasure, and Peer-Reviewed Penises

    Very Bad Wizards

    David and Tamler break down the latest small-stakes academic controversy--yes the one about conceptual penises. Does the recent "Sokal-like" hoax expose the ideological extremism of gender studies? Or does it show that certain portions of the "skeptic" community are susceptible to the same biases as their opponents? In the main segment they discuss the problems with measuring pain, pleasure, and happiness. When your doctor asks you to rate your pain between 1 and 10 and you say a 7, does your '7' reflect the same subjective experience as another person's '7'? (That depends--have you experienced childbirth?) How can we get more accurate readings of pain and pleasure across different people with different experiences? Most importantly, which number gets yo
    0
    (-)
    Rate this episode:

    Episode mentions

    People mentions

    Transcript

    To see the rest of the transcript, you must sign in

    Reviews

      No reviews yet, be the first!