Search thousands of podcasts, books, movies, and transcripts

Products

Media monitoringSentiment analysis

Blog

IMDb for PodcastsMedia Monitoring ToolsSentiment Analysis in PR and MarketingThe Evolution of Media MonitoringMastering Podcast AdvertisingAudio Market Research has been unlockedAI in Podcast Sentiment AnalysisPodcast intelligence
© 2024 Discotech BV
Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
    Episode 177: Pure Linguistic Chauvinism

    Episode 177: Pure Linguistic Chauvinism

    Very Bad Wizards

    Tamler learns something new about menstruation. David weighs in on the democratic debates and the impeachment hearings. Then we map the various social and political factions onto the factions in our respective fields. Who are establishment neoliberals of philosophy, and who are the white feminists? What about the IDWs of psychology – and the Chads and Stacys? Finally we get serious and break down the article by Alan Fiske in Psychological Review called “The Lexical Fallacy in Emotion Research.” Does language affect how we understand the emotional landscape? Do the words we happen to use deceive us into thinking we have “carved nature at its joints”? What is a natural kind anyway when it comes to emotions? Plus, after the outro, a quick unedited Mr. Robot discussion of the revelation in s
    0
    (-)
    Rate this episode:

    Episode mentions

    People mentions

    Transcript

    To see the rest of the transcript, you must sign in

    Reviews

      No reviews yet, be the first!